Jeff King is a well respected engineer and is a scientist. In this compelling video, he derails through the use of scientific analysis and study the government's official version that the buildings were brought down due to the excessive heat from the airplane crashes.

 

Imagine that: scientific evidence being discussed, which is something you won't see discussed in our media.

 

The events of 9/11 should be studied with a rigorous forensic and scientific mindset -- and Jeff King offers such analysis. For those media detractors like Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and others, I wonder why they won't even consider the scientific evidence that is at the very least very compelling. I already know the answer to that question.

 

Think about it: it's worse being called a "conspiracy theorist" than it is to be called a pedophile in our society. That is astonishing to me. If a free-thinking person even questions the government's views, they're criticized, mocked, and labeled as "mentally ill" -- a phrase Bill O'Reilly has used in referring to 9/11 truthers.

 

King is not the only engineer and scientist to question the government's official version. Joel Hirschhorn, PhD, is a former Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment 1978 to 1990 and former Professor of Mechanical Engineering. Earlier this year, he wrote, "Many technical analyses cast doubt on the official explanation of the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings, including those presented by an impressive new group: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth."

 

 

---